Skip to main content

Twisters: Cash-Grab Remake or Refreshing Standalone?

I went into Twisters expecting yet another cash-grab remake, but I was pleasantly surprised by what I found. The trailers might have suggested this film was just another addition to the franchise, but it turned out to be a lot more than that.

Image by DVD Release Dates

Twisters feels like a movie that could have stood on its own, independent of the franchise. However, like most movies today, it was anchored by a known brand for "visibility." I'm sure this is a marketing decision, but it highlights an industry trend where every new release is tagged as part of an existing series. The only real connections to the original Twister are the tornadoes (obviously) and the machine, Dorothy, designed to capture measurements from within the storm. Interestingly, the film could have completely ditched Dorothy, and it wouldn't have mattered. It was not a central focus of this story.

Character-Driven Drama: More Than Just Storm Chasers

Much like the original Twister, this film revolves around storm chasers, but this time, it prioritizes character-driven drama rather than just storm-chasing spectacle. I love the original film, but even as a fan, I acknowledge its flaws, especially in character development and progression.

In Twisters, every character had a purpose, a backstory, and significance. In contrast, many of the side characters in the original felt like they were just along for the ride. Here, the narrative and character arcs are thoughtfully intertwined, giving everyone a role to play and a moment to shine.


Image by Empire Online

A Unique Scientific Angle on Tornadoes

The story brings a unique perspective on dealing with tornadoes. I'm not a scientist, so I can't vouch for the accuracy of the science involved, but it offered a good angle to explore. The bait-and-switch early in the movie caught me off guard, turning my initial assumptions on their head. This twist is executed well, thanks to the well-crafted characters whose backstories unfold naturally without the crutch of exposition.

Image by The Direct

Age and Believability: Kate's Youthful Charisma

I couldn't quite buy into Kate, the main actress's age, given the depth of her role and achievements. She seemed a bit young to fit the part, but this observation didn't detract from my overall enjoyment of the film. It was just a small nitpick in an otherwise engaging performance.

Image by The Hollywood Reporter

Grounded Reality: A Step Away from Ridiculousness

Compared to the original, Twisters feels more grounded in reality. The original pushed the boundaries of believability with Joe and Bill driving a truck through a house and a tornado picking up a tanker truck but leaving the characters untouched. In this film, while there are moments that stretch believability, they are more restrained, which was a refreshing change.

Image by IMDb

Humor and Timing: Forced Rather Than Natural

One area where this version lacked was humor. The original Twister had well-timed comedic moments that fit naturally into the narrative. While Twisters had its share of humor, it often felt forced rather than flowing organically from the characters or situations.

Image by People

Mother-Daughter Dynamics: A Missed Opportunity

The introduction of Kate's mother late in the film was another aspect that didn’t quite hit the mark. In the original, Joe's Aunt was seamlessly integrated into the story, providing emotional stakes when the tornado threatens her. In contrast, Kate’s mother feels more like a “need to have” addition rather than a meaningful part of the plot. The movie suggests a strained relationship between Kate and her mother, yet offers little explanation or indication of this dynamic when they are together.

Image by Mashable

A Drawn-Out Finale: Stretching the Runtime

The ending felt more drawn out than necessary. What could have been a concise 10-minute conclusion was stretched to nearly half an hour, likely contributing to the film’s longer runtime compared to the original.

Final Thoughts

Overall, I’d give Twisters a 7.5 out of 10. As a remake, it manages to carve out a voice of its own, standing against the gigantic shadow cast by the original movie. More importantly, it possesses a soul, something that many films in this age sorely lack. Twisters might not be perfect, but it offers a refreshing take on a familiar story with a character-driven focus that resonates.


Pros:

  • Surprisingly Refreshing: Defies the typical cash-grab expectations, offering more substance.
  • Character-Driven Story: Focuses on character development and personal arcs, giving each character significance.
  • Unique Scientific Perspective: Offers an interesting angle on tornadoes, even if the science is questionable.
  • Grounded Reality: More believable than the original, with a restrained approach to its more absurd moments.
  • Engaging Character Backstories: Characters' backstories unfold naturally without reliance on exposition.
  • Well-Executed Bait-and-Switch: Successfully subverts expectations with a clever plot twist.

    • Cons:

  • Forced Humor: Lacks the natural comedic timing of the original, with humor feeling somewhat contrived.
  • Unnecessary Franchise Labeling: Feels anchored to a known brand for visibility, even though it could stand alone.
  • Kate’s Age: Main actress seems a bit young for her role, although this doesn’t majorly impact the film.
  • Mother-Daughter Dynamic: The introduction of Kate's mother feels unnecessary and lacks depth.
  • Drawn-Out Ending: The finale is stretched longer than needed, adding to the film’s runtime.

    • Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

    Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

    Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

    Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St
    Post a Comment
    Read more