Skip to main content

Identity: A Classic Murder Mystery with a Psychological Twist

Identity is a film that continues to hold its ground as a compelling murder mystery, offering a unique narrative that delves into the complexities of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). Despite my limited knowledge of psychology, I found its portrayal of DID intriguing, particularly how the identities within a single mind eliminate each other to arrive at one dominant personality. While this may not be an accurate representation of therapeutic practices, it makes for a fascinating plot device.

Image by Reddit

Engaging Mystery and Suspense

The film excels in creating suspense, making the audience suspect various characters trapped in a motel of being the killer. The script skillfully makes you believe it could be any one of five or so characters, keeping viewers on edge.

The movie offers a unique glimpse into DID by showing the internal conflict among different identities, each trying to assert dominance. While not necessarily realistic, it provides an interesting framework for the narrative.

Image by IMDb

Grounded Storytelling

The integration of "real-life" events involving the man with DID provides a grounded feel to the story. It seamlessly transitions from what appears to be two separate storylines into a cohesive narrative, enhancing the film’s overall impact.

Most characters' backstories are revealed through flashbacks, connecting their past actions to their current predicament at the motel. This storytelling method adds depth and context, making the mystery more engaging. Not all characters receive the same depth of backstory though. For instance, Larry’s narrative about finding the motel owner dead is told but not shown. Similarly, Ginny and Lou’s pasts are only hinted at, leaving gaps in their character development.

Image by This is Barry

Uneven Character Development

While the script makes several characters plausible suspects, others are clearly not. For instance, the convict or the limo driver are obvious suspects, but characters like the stuttering step-father, the fake pregnant woman, and the lady obsessed with picking oranges never seem threatening. This disparity can break the suspense for viewers.

Image by Fanpop

Predictable Twist

While the twist is cleverly executed, it might be predictable for some viewers. The reveal, although satisfying, may not be as shocking to those familiar with the genre. The frustrating part of this, is the rest of the movie is written so well with intrigue all across the landscape. From the sudden inclusion of Motel keys showing up on bodies, to the landscape seemingly looping onto its-self to the bodies disappearing, it keeps the viewer interested and on their toes.

Image by Signal Horizon

Final Thoughts

Identity still captivates with its intriguing plot and psychological depth, making it a worthwhile watch even after all these years. The film’s strengths lie in its unique portrayal of DID, engaging flashbacks, and the seamless blending of real-life events with the central mystery. Despite some uneven character development and a predictable twist, it remains an engrossing murder mystery.

Overall, I’d give Identity a 7 out of 10. It stands the test of time, and new viewers are likely to find themselves drawn into its web of intrigue and suspense.



Pros:

  • Great Story: Subverts expectations with a compelling murder mystery.
  • Intriguing Portrayal of a Hard Subject: Unique and interesting portrayal of DID.
  • 3-Dimensional Characters: Engaging flashbacks that provide depth to the characters.
  • Great Back and Forth: Seamless integration of real-life events.

  • Cons:

  • Unbalanced Arcs: Uneven character development with some non-threatening suspects.
  • Character Bias: Missed opportunities for more comprehensive backstories.
  • Familiar Trope: Predictable twist for some viewers.
  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

    Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something

    IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

    Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame

    Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

    Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St