Skip to main content

Just Friends: A Not-So-Friendly Rom-Com

Just Friends tries to deliver as a romantic comedy but ultimately falls short in both genres. The film, starring Ryan Reynolds, Anna Faris, Amy Smart, and Chris Klein, is a mixed bag of missed opportunities and uneven performances that leave it floundering in mediocrity.

Image by Microsoft

The Good

I always like to start on the positive side of the movie. Unfortunately, this will be the shortest part of this review. Chris Klein and Anna Faris' performances are magic. Chris Klein shines as Dusty, delivering a performance that goes against his usual typecast roles. He brings a unique charm and comedic timing that stands out in the otherwise uneven cast. As for Anna Faris, she simply excels at playing the insanely unpredictable pop star Samantha James. Her energy and commitment to the character are evident, even if her antics sometimes detract from the main story.

Image by Netflix

The premise of wanting revenge on a scorned ex is a great starting point, and one that a lot of men can likely relate to. The unfortunate part was this was just not executed well.

The Bad

The movie's core plot—Chris's high school heartbreak and his later attempt to win over his old crush, Jamie—gets lost amidst a flurry of subplots. There's barely any substantial development in the love story, with only a single scene hinting at their reconciliation. When Chris reunites with Jamie, his initial vengeful behavior quickly dissipates without any real drama or tension. Jamie's immediate forgiveness feels forced, eliminating any potential "will they/won't they" intrigue.

Image by Us Weekly

The comedic moments, though present, are awkwardly interspersed with dramatic scenes. This uneven blend leaves the audience uncertain about how to react, diminishing the overall impact of the humor. While Anna Faris’s character is meant to be a chaotic force in Chris’s life, her over-the-top behavior ends up distracting from the central narrative. Her scenes dominate the screen, pulling focus away from the intended romantic arc. On top of that, Chris often pawns off Samantha to his brother, diluting any real conflict she might have brought to the story.

Unlike typical rom-coms that build tension through near-miss moments, Just Friends focuses more on Chris's internal conflict. This leaves little room for genuine romantic development between Chris and Jamie.

Image by Decider

The Ugly

Ryan Reynolds, usually known for his vibrant, comedic presence, delivers a performance that feels forced and at times, contrived. His portrayal of Chris lacks the spark needed to elevate the film. Amy Smart, usually a reliable actress, falls flat as Jamie. Her character lacks depth and emotional resonance, making it difficult for the audience to root for her and Chris.

There just was no time for their romance to blossom. There were very few scenes that allowed Jamie to actually transition from seeing Chris as a friend to someone she could be with. It's a real shame too, because there were easily scenes being presented that gave opportunities for this. Such as when Chris discovers that Dusty is just playing Jamie. He tells Jamie, she doesn't believe him, which in of it's self is fine. However, when she ultimately finds that same information out for herself, there is no moment of introspection. No light bulb event that tells her "Maybe he's always been there and I just didn't see it". Just a shame.

The end is as predictable as the taste of peanut butter and is tied up in about as much time as it takes to say that.
Image by The Last Resortng special to the mix.

Final Thoughts

Just Friends had the potential to be a quirky, heartwarming rom-com but instead ends up as a drab, forgettable film. Despite a few standout performances, the lack of cohesive storytelling, uneven humor, and underdeveloped character dynamics weigh it down. It pales in comparison to more successful romantic comedies from the same era, like How To Lose a Guy in 10 Days, Runaway Bride, and Ghosts of Girlfriends Past.

Overall, I’d give Just Friends a 4 out of 10. It’s a passable watch if you’re a fan of the genre, but don’t expect it to hold a candle to the classics. In the crowded field of romantic comedies, Just Friends fails to make a lasting impression. If you’re looking for a rom-com that delivers both romance and laughs, there are far better options to choose from.


Pros:

  • Chris Klein’s standout performance as Dusty.
  • Anna Faris’s energetic portrayal of Samantha James.

    • Cons:

  • Unfocused and underdeveloped love story.
  • Forced and uneven comedic moments.
  • Lack of romantic tension and build-up.
  • Distracting over-the-top antics from supporting characters.
  • Flat performances from Ryan Reynolds and Amy Smart.


    • Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

    Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

    I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Weapons 2025 – A Witches' Brew Without the Witchcraft

    I had never heard of Weapons 2025 . My wife had seen a trailer and it was a cheap night at the cinema, so we had little choice but to give it a shot. I braced myself for a film that would either be a spectacular new take on a classic subgenre or just another low-budget bust. What I didn’t expect was something that felt less like a movie and more like a fever dream cobbled together from half-baked ideas and an abundance of reshoots. Image by IMDb A Horror That's Not Quite Horror For a film marketed as a horror movie, Weapons 2025 has very little to do with horror. The scares are non-existent. There is a persistent, gnawing tension from the premise of children vanishing into the night, but it quickly dissolves when you realize that's all there is to it. The initial premise sets up a tantalizing mystery, but that flimsy veil is lifted within minutes, and you know exactly what is going on. What follows is not a mystery, a horror, or even a drama. It's a series of disconnected,...
    Post a Comment
    Read more