Skip to main content

Scream – A Pioneering Slasher That Still Packs a Punch

Scream was a breath of fresh air in the mid-90s horror scene, revitalizing a genre that had begun to feel stale. It’s easy to forget just how original this movie was when it first hit theaters. Sure, it leaned heavily on established horror tropes, but it did so with a level of self-awareness and cleverness that felt revolutionary at the time.

Image by Rotten Tomatoes

A Clever Subversion of Horror Tropes

Scream does an excellent job of making fun of its own audience while simultaneously subverting their expectations. It’s a film that knows you’ve seen all the horror tropes before and plays with that knowledge to keep you on your toes. The script is ingeniously meta, poking fun at the very conventions it employs. Characters openly discuss horror movie rules, only to fall victim to them in unexpected ways. It’s a smart, self-aware approach that keeps you engaged.

Image by The Guardian

Brutal Killings and Genuine Suspense

One of the standout elements of Scream is its unapologetic brutality. The killings are graphic and intense, providing a level of violence that many horror films today shy away from. This level of rawness adds to the film’s impact, making the stakes feel real and the terror palpable. It’s a shame that more modern horror movies don’t embrace this, as without it, they often feel hollow and as deep as a tablespoon.

Image by Scream-Movies.com

Missteps in Casting and Character Chemistry

However, Scream isn’t without its flaws. The casting feels off in several places. The high school friend group is supposed to be a tight-knit unit, but the lack of chemistry among the actors makes this hard to believe. Billy, for instance, looks noticeably older than the rest of the group. The relationships—be it between Billy and Sidney, Gail and Dewey, or Tatum and Stuart—lack the convincing connections that would make their interactions more believable.

Randy, meant to serve as the audience's eyes, feels out of place. His character is awkward and doesn't mesh well with the others, despite being a crucial part of the narrative. The casting choices detract from the film's overall immersion, making it harder to buy into the story.

Image by Entertainment Weekly

Drew Barrymore: A Misplaced Talent

Drew Barrymore’s casting is another curious decision. She was far too big of a star for such a small role, and her character’s sole purpose is to be the first to die. While her presence undoubtedly added star power and shock value, it feels like a waste of her talent. This choice, while bold, ultimately feels like a strange and underutilized use of an “A” list actress.

Image by PopCrush

Flaws in the Whodunit Aspect

Wes Craven’s attempt to keep you guessing who the killer is falls short at times. While he tries to paint everyone as a potential suspect, the execution often feels clumsy. Characters who are made to look suspicious are quickly killed off, removing any real sense of mystery. The principal is a prime example: one moment he's a suspect, and the next, he's dead. The sheriff’s boots, identical to the killer’s, are highlighted once but he is never revisited. The film hints at a deeper mystery but fails to fully develop it, leaving a mile-wide, inch-deep investigation.

Image by MovieWeb

Final Thoughts: A Groundbreaking but Flawed Classic

Despite its flaws, Scream was undeniably original upon its release. Watching it again with older eyes, it’s clear how many subsequent films have tried to capture its magic. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and Scream’s influence on the genre is evident in the countless films that have borrowed its self-referential style and brutal honesty.

Scream remains a significant film in the horror genre, both for its originality at the time and its lasting influence. While it’s far from perfect—hampered by casting missteps, some questionable narrative choices, and an occasionally shallow mystery—it still stands out for its clever script and brutal kills. If you haven’t seen it in a while, it’s worth a rewatch to appreciate its place in horror history.

Overall, I’d give Scream a solid 6.5 out of 10. It’s a pioneering slasher that still packs a punch, even if it falls short of its full potential.


Pros:

  • Originality: At the time of its release, Scream felt incredibly fresh, cleverly using and subverting horror tropes.
  • Violence and Brutality: The killings are still brutal and impactful, providing a level of intensity often missing in modern horror.
  • Clever Script: The screenplay is smart and self-referential, making fun of the audience while keeping them guessing.
  • Impact on the Genre: Its influence is undeniable, setting a template for future horror films to imitate.

    • Cons:

  • Casting Issues: The high school friend group lacks chemistry, and some characters feel miscast.
  • Drew Barrymore’s Role: An odd choice to cast such a big name in a minor role, her presence feels underutilized.
  • Predictability: Despite Wes Craven’s efforts to keep everyone a suspect, some red herrings fall flat and are too quickly resolved.

    • Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

    Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

    Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

    Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St
    Post a Comment
    Read more