Skip to main content

Wicked (2024) – A Mixed Spell of Enchantment and Frustration

Right off the bat, I have to admit: musicals and I don’t usually get along. If I can count on one hand the musicals I genuinely enjoy, that’s being generous. So when I sat down to watch Wicked, I was already crafting my critique in my head. But somewhere along the way, something happened. The movie started to work for me—until it didn’t. Let me explain.

Image via IMDb

A Vibrant and Immersive Oz

First off, the set and costume design are top-tier. The world of Oz has never felt more alive, immersive, or well-thought-out. I’m a fan of The Wizard of Oz and have always appreciated the intricate world-building within it. Much like The Lord of the Rings, every bizarre element of Oz feels like it has a purpose and a place. It’s whimsical yet grounded, and Wicked captures that beautifully.

Image by ELLE Decor

Strong Character Arcs

The characters also deserve praise. Each one felt three-dimensional, and the movie took care to give even minor players their own arcs. It’s rare for a film to strike such a balance, but Wicked did it well. And those little touches of story-building were a highlight for me: explaining the witch’s broom, Glinda’s rise to "Good Witch" status (though that’s debatable), the origins of the Yellow Brick Road, and the Emerald City’s grandeur. These moments gave depth to the world in ways I didn’t expect.

Image by Los Angeles Times

An Intriguing Start, but Then...

Through most of the film, I was invested. I found myself genuinely curious about how it would all tie into the Oz canon. However, as the story unfolded—and as I remembered this is only Part 1—I realized not everything would be resolved here. That’s fair. What isn’t fair is how the movie completely derails in its closing act.

Image by Collider

The Betrayal of Elphaba

Let’s talk about Elphaba, the “Wicked” Witch. The film does an excellent job showcasing why she might turn evil: childhood rejection by her father, ridicule from her peers, and the weight of guilt over her mother’s death. These elements made her sympathetic and tragic. But then the movie pulls a bait-and-switch. Suddenly, Elphaba isn’t wicked at all—she’s the hero. Oz is the villain, the Emerald City is a tyrannical empire, and Elphaba is the leader of the resistance.

Image by The Direct

Canon, Consistency, and Frustration

Making the witch a "Save the whales" activist undermines the emotional investment I had in her character. If the narrative wants to reframe her as misunderstood, fine. But it should still stay true to the canon. Instead, it tries to rewrite history while simultaneously cherry-picking from the original lore. For example, Oz is painted as a straight-up evil dictator, despite canon portraying him as a flawed but not malicious conman. The hypocrisy of adhering to some aspects of the original story while discarding others drove me up the wall.

And let’s not forget the central conceit: Elphaba isn’t wicked; she’s only labeled as such by the powers that be. That might work in another story, but here, it feels forced and hollow. Why call her "Wicked" at all if you’re going to make her a misunderstood savior?

Image by Kuow

Final Thoughts

I can only give this a 5 out of 10. By the time the credits rolled, my goodwill for the movie had evaporated. While I enjoyed much of the craftsmanship and storytelling up until the last act, those final 15 minutes left a sour taste. I couldn’t help but feel insulted on behalf of the original creators and the fans who cherish the established lore.

I loved much of Wicked—up until I didn’t. The world-building and performances are fantastic, but the final act’s betrayal of the original lore and the shallow resolution make it hard to recommend. For fans of The Wizard of Oz, it might be more frustrating than magical.

Pros

  • Stunning world-building: The set and costume design bring Oz to life in breathtaking detail, making it feel vibrant and immersive.
  • Great character arcs: Even the supporting characters have depth, giving the story more weight and texture.
  • Compelling story-building: Small but meaningful touches, like the witch’s broom and the Yellow Brick Road, flesh out the world beautifully.
  • Excellent performances: The cast, particularly Elphaba’s portrayal, does a great job making the characters feel real and relatable.

Cons

  • Canon-breaking plot: Rewriting Oz’s history to make Elphaba the hero undermines the original story and feels inconsistent.
  • Disjointed messaging: The film tries to balance staying true to some parts of the lore while completely disregarding others.
  • Weak final act: The last 15 minutes derail the narrative, feeling forced and tonally out of place.
  • Shallow thematic payoff: While it explores interesting ideas, the film ultimately doesn’t commit to any of them in a satisfying way.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Wild Robot: An Amazingly Deep Animated Journey

When I first saw the trailers for The Wild Robot , I expected a straightforward story about a robot learning to survive in the wild. To some extent, that’s true, but that’s far from the movie’s main focus—and honestly, that’s for the better. What I ended up with was a much more emotionally rich experience than the marketing suggested. Image by Universal Pictures Story and Animation: A Beautiful Combination Right off the bat, the story was more compelling than I initially thought. While the survival element is there, it quickly shifts into something more meaningful, as Roz, the robot, becomes the caretaker of a duckling. It’s a unique twist for an animated movie, and it doesn’t sugarcoat the harsh realities of nature. We see animals getting hunted or taken by predators, something most animated movies shy away from—certainly not the Disney-fied version of the animal kingdom. The movie wasn't afraid to take risks that feel refreshing in today’s overly safe films. And I can't talk ...
Post a Comment
Read more