Skip to main content

Heretic (2024): A Twisted Take on Captivity and Faith

When I sat down to watch Heretic, I thought I was in for a straightforward creepy-kidnap thriller. And yes, there’s a captivity element at its core, but the film takes a turn into something far more introspective and psychological than I expected. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it does catch you off guard—it isn’t the typical cat-and-mouse horror. And that approach actually manages to bring out some deeply unsettling elements, just in a different way.

Image by IMDb

Words as Weapons of Fear

One of Heretic's most unique aspects is its slow, simmering creep factor that doesn’t rely on dark corners or shadowy lurking. The captor isn’t hiding or cloaked in mystery; in fact, he’s front and center. It’s his words, his unnervingly calm demeanor, that inject a skin-crawling tension. It’s refreshing—and disturbing—to see a character who doesn’t need to physically intimidate. His words do all the damage.

Image by IMDb

Hugh Grant's Haunting Performance

The standout here, without question, is Hugh Grant. He’s been taking on roles lately that stretch beyond what you’d expect from his career in rom-coms, and this might be one of his best. His performance is magnetic and so deeply unsettling that I almost forgot I was watching a movie; he was that convincing. At times, it felt like I was watching a twisted true crime drama unfold in real-time. Chloe East and Sophie Thatcher bring excellent performances as well, nailing the tricky balance of portraying naivety and resilience. It’s not an easy feat to keep an audience invested in characters who feel somewhat helpless, yet they pull it off well.

Image by Cinemasight

Predictable Yet Thought-Provoking Plot

Once you get a grasp on where the story’s headed, it does start to feel a bit predictable. There’s a small twist thrown in, but it doesn’t alter the direction much. Still, I was intrigued by the film’s commentary on religion. Personally, I don’t consider myself religious, and I appreciate a film that takes an honest look at belief systems without an agenda. Heretic dives into various religions with a surprising level of care and even-handedness. It’s presented in such a way that, even if you don’t have a background in religious study, you’ll be able to follow and appreciate what it’s trying to say. This added layer is interesting but only adds so much weight in the end. Don't ask me how accurate it is, because I have no idea. It seemed logical is all I can say.

Image by Collider

Final Thoughts

Score: 6 out of 10. Hugh Grant’s performance holds this movie together, and the script has some very interesting ideas, especially in its take on faith and manipulation. But after the initial intrigue, the characters don’t develop much, and the plot starts to feel one-dimensional, despite the attempted twists. It’s creepy enough to warrant a watch, but this might be one you wait for at home rather than the theater. A solid effort with some standout moments but falls short of being unforgettable.


Pros:

  • Uniquely unsettling: The captor’s upfront, conversational approach to terror is refreshingly creepy, relying on his words rather than typical horror tactics.
  • Hugh Grant’s standout performance: Grant's transformation here is incredible. He brings a chilling authenticity, grounding the entire film with his unsettling charisma.
  • Strong supporting performances: Chloe East and Sophie Thatcher nail their roles, making their characters feel believable and relatable amidst the horror.
  • Interesting religious themes: The film’s exploration of religious comparison is thought-provoking, especially for non-religious viewers, offering a surprisingly balanced perspective.

Cons:

  • Predictable story arc: Once you understand the plot, it’s not hard to guess where things are headed, limiting the suspense in the final act.
  • Minimal character development: Despite strong performances, the characters (except perhaps Chloe’s) don’t experience much depth or growth.
  • Ending lacks impact: Although there’s a twist, it’s subtle and doesn’t add significant weight to the story’s resolution.
  • May not justify a theater visit: The film's appeal might not be enough to warrant the big screen experience; it’s one that could work just as well for a home viewing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...

Girl in the Basement: A Disturbing Story That’s Hard to Shake Off

Girl in the Basement is a film that might easily be overlooked as just another made-for-TV movie, but that would be a mistake. It’s actually a surprisingly well-crafted and emotionally gripping film, especially considering its television origins. Image by Senscritique A Heartbreaking, True Story The story at the heart of Girl in the Basement is absolutely heartbreaking. We’ve all seen movies that claim to be "Based on real events," but this one is different. It doesn’t take liberties with the truth for the sake of drama. In fact, it tones down the horrific reality of the true story it’s based on, which is almost unheard of. After researching the actual events, it’s clear why the filmmakers made this choice—it would have been too much to bear otherwise.  Image by Heavy.com Genuine Suspense and Engagement It’s been a long time since a film had me so actively engaged in the moment. The suspense in Girl in the Basement is palpable. From the first moment, I found myself anxious...

The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...