Skip to main content

Identity: A Classic Murder Mystery with a Psychological Twist

Identity is a film that continues to hold its ground as a compelling murder mystery, offering a unique narrative that delves into the complexities of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). Despite my limited knowledge of psychology, I found its portrayal of DID intriguing, particularly how the identities within a single mind eliminate each other to arrive at one dominant personality. While this may not be an accurate representation of therapeutic practices, it makes for a fascinating plot device.

Image by Reddit

Engaging Mystery and Suspense

The film excels in creating suspense, making the audience suspect various characters trapped in a motel of being the killer. The script skillfully makes you believe it could be any one of five or so characters, keeping viewers on edge.

The movie offers a unique glimpse into DID by showing the internal conflict among different identities, each trying to assert dominance. While not necessarily realistic, it provides an interesting framework for the narrative.

Image by IMDb

Grounded Storytelling

The integration of "real-life" events involving the man with DID provides a grounded feel to the story. It seamlessly transitions from what appears to be two separate storylines into a cohesive narrative, enhancing the film’s overall impact.

Most characters' backstories are revealed through flashbacks, connecting their past actions to their current predicament at the motel. This storytelling method adds depth and context, making the mystery more engaging. Not all characters receive the same depth of backstory though. For instance, Larry’s narrative about finding the motel owner dead is told but not shown. Similarly, Ginny and Lou’s pasts are only hinted at, leaving gaps in their character development.

Image by This is Barry

Uneven Character Development

While the script makes several characters plausible suspects, others are clearly not. For instance, the convict or the limo driver are obvious suspects, but characters like the stuttering step-father, the fake pregnant woman, and the lady obsessed with picking oranges never seem threatening. This disparity can break the suspense for viewers.

Image by Fanpop

Predictable Twist

While the twist is cleverly executed, it might be predictable for some viewers. The reveal, although satisfying, may not be as shocking to those familiar with the genre. The frustrating part of this, is the rest of the movie is written so well with intrigue all across the landscape. From the sudden inclusion of Motel keys showing up on bodies, to the landscape seemingly looping onto its-self to the bodies disappearing, it keeps the viewer interested and on their toes.

Image by Signal Horizon

Final Thoughts

Identity still captivates with its intriguing plot and psychological depth, making it a worthwhile watch even after all these years. The film’s strengths lie in its unique portrayal of DID, engaging flashbacks, and the seamless blending of real-life events with the central mystery. Despite some uneven character development and a predictable twist, it remains an engrossing murder mystery.

Overall, I’d give Identity a 7 out of 10. It stands the test of time, and new viewers are likely to find themselves drawn into its web of intrigue and suspense.



Pros:

  • Great Story: Subverts expectations with a compelling murder mystery.
  • Intriguing Portrayal of a Hard Subject: Unique and interesting portrayal of DID.
  • 3-Dimensional Characters: Engaging flashbacks that provide depth to the characters.
  • Great Back and Forth: Seamless integration of real-life events.

  • Cons:

  • Unbalanced Arcs: Uneven character development with some non-threatening suspects.
  • Character Bias: Missed opportunities for more comprehensive backstories.
  • Familiar Trope: Predictable twist for some viewers.
  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

    I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...

    Fantastic Four: First Steps – A Cautious Beginning That Barely Walks

    Going into Fantastic Four: First Steps , I’ll be honest—I was hesitantly optimistic. Marvel's recent track record hasn’t exactly been confidence-inspiring, and I didn’t know whether this film would add to the pile of forgettables or manage to pull something worthwhile from the rubble. The short version? It’s better than what came before it... but that’s a low bar to clear. Image by Disney Better... But That’s Not Saying Much Yes, this is the best Fantastic Four film so far—but let’s not throw a parade just yet. That’s like saying a sprained ankle is better than a broken leg. It’s still not a good time. This isn’t Infinity War or No Way Home . It’s more like a cautiously made, safe middle-ground that never dares to do anything bold or game-changing. Image by Consequence.net Retro Aesthetic Done Right On the positive side, I liked the unexpected characters that popped in here and there, and I thought the alternative 60s timeline worked surprisingly well. The aesthetic was actually ...

    Final Destination: Bloodlines – A Bloody Fun Return to Form

    I’m a big fan of the Final Destination series, so I was honestly surprised to hear that another installment was in the works. Part 5 wrapped things up in such a neat little bow that it felt like the story had come full circle. So when Bloodlines was announced, I was hesitantly optimistic. Could they recapture the magic (and mayhem) of the originals without running the whole thing into the ground? I’m glad to report—it was worth the price of admission. Image by Pacific Science Center Not Shakespeare, But It’ll Do Let’s just be clear up front: this is not some masterpiece of screenwriting. The plot is about as flimsy as ever, and no one here is giving an Oscar-caliber performance. But let’s be real—if you’re showing up to a Final Destination movie expecting award-winning drama, you’ve already wandered into the wrong theater. That said, the writing didn’t make me want to claw my ears off either, which is more than I can say for a lot of recent horror flicks. It was… fine. Image by The...