Skip to main content

Mortal Kombat: Fatality (Minor Spoiler Review)

Ah Mortal Kombat, easily my favourite fighting game since I was a young man playing in the arcade (Yes, I'm that old). For anyone who had seen the 1990's version of the Mortal Kombat movies I am happy to say this movie blows them out of the water. Notice how I also didn't say it was a great movie. Let's face it, the original movie(s) really didn't set the bar very high in acting, story or special effects (OMG the effects are bad in the originals and definitely do not hold up today). While this new version of the beloved game franchise delivers on gory Fatalities for the fandom, it unfortunately also loses those same fans. This new movie has the fatalities that any of us fans have always wanted to see in a live-action film, right down to Kung Lou's Spinning Hat fatality. However, this movie almost completely left the original story behind and didn't replace it with much of anything.

For those that read this and don't know what the original Mortal Kombat story is, here we go. The original 1992 backstory was that Outworld was trying to invade Earthrealm (Earth). A dictational leader Shao Kahn wanted to invade but the Elder gods of the realms wouldn't just hand over Earthrealm to him. They wrote the rules that Shao Kahn must pick his mightiest warriors to face and defeat Eathrealms warriors in 10 straight victories in a tournament rightfully called Mortal Kombat. The first game picked up after Shao Kahn's warriors had won 9 out of the 10 needed tournaments.

This is technically still in place in the newest movie, but the movie brushes over it like it wasn't important. The movie takes all the fighting away from the tournament as Shang Tsung (Shao Kahn's most trusted sorcerer) has devised a brilliant plan to kill the Earthrealm combatants before they can actually compete in the last tournament. The issue I have with this isn't the premise of the plan, but that after like 1000 years of combat, he suddenly had the epiphany to do this. In the games, Shang Tsung is absolutely a genius on the level of the Emperor from Star Wars. He's tactical, powerful, a mastermind and above all else, evil for his own sake. Almost none of that shines through in this movie which was a let down.

Yes, the fatalities are amazingly awesome in this film. I cheered when some of them were happening (ok that sounds bad. Maybe I have a problem....I digress) however that does not make for a great movie. Yes, I loved how Goro looked. He was extremely well done physically and with special effects. However, even the original did a much better job at making Goro out to be a real threat. In this movie, he is kinda' just thrown into the ring per-say with Cole, the new, and in my opinion, unneeded character that was added to the roster.

Cole is supposed to act as the viewer's sense of being thrown into this world. There's nothing exactly wrong with Cole as much as there also isn't anything memorable about him. He could have easily been replaced by a long standing (and missing) character named Johnny Cage, who will undoubtedly be in the next movie. Cole just didn't have anything going for him that was unique. There was a plethora of Mortal Kombat characters already established so I'm not really sure why we needed a new one for this film.

All in all, was I entertained, yes, yes I was. I loved the gore that finally made it's way to the screen. There were a lot of things done right in the movie, but unfortunately for me, there was more done wrong. I understand my opinion is critical due to reviewing this and being a beginner fan, but there was just no bang after the initial punch of the Scorpion/Sub-Zero fight. There was too much left out and too much that either had no place or that just didn't make sense at all. Many questionable choices were made like putting Mileena into the movie, but not the lady she was cloned from, Kitana, or how about Kano not having a plate in his head which has only been there since the first game. Speaking of that though, Kano does do his original fatality as a nice call back to the first game. There were many questionable times that characters said things that clearly only were there because of the game like when Liu Kang says "Flawless victory" even though it wasn't flawless at all. When did he learn to hold onto fire by the way? He's always been able to through it, but not just hold it like a flash light. Again, his dragon fatality is in there and looks beautiful. And yes, I cheered when I saw it.

I have questions. For instance, let's talk about the dragon tattoo. So it is said in the movie that if you kill someone with the tattoo, then it transfers to you and you are then able to "compete" in the tournament, and we see this in the movie. So, if some random person hits Jax with a bus and kills him, they'd get his dragon mark? How about if someone kills two people with the mark? Do they get 2 dragon tattoos now? It was a silly addition that was just not fleshed out nor was needed in the first place.

There was just so, so much potential with this movie and it was left by the wayside. An example of this was another new character Nataro, a Harpy of sorts that basically is used in only one event and is easily beaten. I don't think she has more than 60 seconds of actual film time. She could have had a place in the games. Her concept is incredible, but alas, not used to a tenth of her potential. 

Clearly the director understood the games as he got the fatalities right on the money, but somehow he missed the essence of Mortal Kombat. You don't need to make the movie around the tournament, but you need to acknowledge the past before jumping into the future. The games now don't use the tournament at all as an example, but they earned that by telling the story across many games and building to the point where it isn't necessary to have the tournament anymore. The average viewer that had never seen or played Mortal Kombat would have no idea why they're not actually competing in anything.

Oh well, another one bites the dust. 


Overall score: 4 out of 10 stars


Pros:
- The fatalities are very accurate to the games. 
- The fighting is incredibly well choreographed. 
- A fresh take on an aging franchise. 

Cons:
- Extremely weak story. 
- Missing well known and key characters from the franchise. 
- Character arcs are not explored almost at all. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fallout - Worth The Fire

  Well, it's been a long time. Over the last 7 months or so, I've watched a whole lot of everything, but honestly, I was just tired. I was tired of basically writing the same reviews for all the new movies out there. I felt like my keyboard was stuck with only certain words available to describe the current media. Words like "WOKE", or "Weak" or "Missed opportunity" and several other lets say not pleasant words. Then we come to the release of Fallout. I adore the Fallout series of games (Yes all of them, even 76 [which was better without settlers in the Wasteland. I will die on that hill]). Just something about the dark humor mixed with what could be (to an extent) real world events. Especially seemingly how we're been headed as a society in the last few years. But, was I worried when I heard there was a show being developed not only now but by Amazon Studios, nah, why would I ever be worried that Amazon would ruin and alienate an existing fanb

IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame

The Boogeyman - Back to the Closet

  Ok, so it's been a while since my last review. I'll be honest, I've become very disenfranchised with the whole movie scene this year. It seems like one after another, each movie comes out and is just, well, garbage. So I started to think, why rate movies at all if the ratings never really change much? Then the hiatus. Diablo 4 came out in the meantime, and yes, I've spent a lot of time playing that too, but I've also watched A LOT of movies in the last few months. What has suddenly brought me back to share my views with you today you might ask? A friend's Facebook post of all things. "Just watched 'The Boogeyman'. This may be the scariest thing I've ever seen", and then I threw up in my mouth a little. So here we go. Yes, I've watched The Boogeyman. Image by IMDB Let's start by saying this is far from the worst movie I have seen, after all, I've watched the Requin and half of Drown the Clown (That review for another day *gross