Skip to main content

To Molan or Not To Molan? Not Even A Question. It's A Nope

Well, I had the.... Experience of watching Mulan live-action tonight. In recent years, I have been so frustrated with Hollywood putting out really decent movies but crutching on the name of something else well known. Mulan falls into this category. Like Child's Play, Evil Dead, Carrie and dozens of other movies that come to mind, Mulan's live-action remake is actually an okay movie on its own. It has great special effects, dramatic scenes, a master score, well-acted scenes and a plethora of vistoic scenery capturing the essence of the era. 

But, and there's a huge but here, it's not the Mulan movie you knew and loved. Yeah yeah, 'they had to change some things'. I get that. All movies have a vision. Some different than others and I'm sure we wouldn't be happy with a carbon-copy remake of the animated classic either. This Mulan movie is little like its original, and that's where my frustration comes in. Yes, it is similar but different enough that Disney could have and should have called it something else. Calling the movie Mulan is like calling me Donald Trump because we're both balding.

This movie's similarities are shallow visual representations of the animated feature that bare physical resemblance but no soul of the original. There was too much missing. The things missing are almost what made Mulan, Mulan in the first place.

Yes, the settings are the same. Yes, the basic theme of a young-lady taking up arms in a "man's" world is very present. The fight scenes were very well choreographed but also felt almost too Matrix-like. She was supposed to be a master swordswoman, not a superhero.

It's hard to really be fair to this movie. When it's a remake of a trusted Disney classic IP, you expect something like The Jungle Book, the Lion King, maybe something that twists the story into a new direction but keeps the core concepts like Maleficent. No, not this movie.

Basically, if you want Mulan, watch the animated movie. If you want a weak love story sprinkled with action cuts that would make the Animatrix a bit jealous, then Mulan 2020 is for you.

Overall score: 4 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- Atmosphere really felt like the dynasty era.
- Acting was fairly well done
- Special Effects were spot on

Cons:
- Missing key characters and events from the original film
- Romance was jerky, forced and in this version of the movie, unneeded
- Felt visual but hollow

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...

Girl in the Basement: A Disturbing Story That’s Hard to Shake Off

Girl in the Basement is a film that might easily be overlooked as just another made-for-TV movie, but that would be a mistake. It’s actually a surprisingly well-crafted and emotionally gripping film, especially considering its television origins. Image by Senscritique A Heartbreaking, True Story The story at the heart of Girl in the Basement is absolutely heartbreaking. We’ve all seen movies that claim to be "Based on real events," but this one is different. It doesn’t take liberties with the truth for the sake of drama. In fact, it tones down the horrific reality of the true story it’s based on, which is almost unheard of. After researching the actual events, it’s clear why the filmmakers made this choice—it would have been too much to bear otherwise.  Image by Heavy.com Genuine Suspense and Engagement It’s been a long time since a film had me so actively engaged in the moment. The suspense in Girl in the Basement is palpable. From the first moment, I found myself anxious...

The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...