Skip to main content

Heretic (2024): A Twisted Take on Captivity and Faith

When I sat down to watch Heretic, I thought I was in for a straightforward creepy-kidnap thriller. And yes, there’s a captivity element at its core, but the film takes a turn into something far more introspective and psychological than I expected. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it does catch you off guard—it isn’t the typical cat-and-mouse horror. And that approach actually manages to bring out some deeply unsettling elements, just in a different way.

Image by IMDb

Words as Weapons of Fear

One of Heretic's most unique aspects is its slow, simmering creep factor that doesn’t rely on dark corners or shadowy lurking. The captor isn’t hiding or cloaked in mystery; in fact, he’s front and center. It’s his words, his unnervingly calm demeanor, that inject a skin-crawling tension. It’s refreshing—and disturbing—to see a character who doesn’t need to physically intimidate. His words do all the damage.

Image by IMDb

Hugh Grant's Haunting Performance

The standout here, without question, is Hugh Grant. He’s been taking on roles lately that stretch beyond what you’d expect from his career in rom-coms, and this might be one of his best. His performance is magnetic and so deeply unsettling that I almost forgot I was watching a movie; he was that convincing. At times, it felt like I was watching a twisted true crime drama unfold in real-time. Chloe East and Sophie Thatcher bring excellent performances as well, nailing the tricky balance of portraying naivety and resilience. It’s not an easy feat to keep an audience invested in characters who feel somewhat helpless, yet they pull it off well.

Image by Cinemasight

Predictable Yet Thought-Provoking Plot

Once you get a grasp on where the story’s headed, it does start to feel a bit predictable. There’s a small twist thrown in, but it doesn’t alter the direction much. Still, I was intrigued by the film’s commentary on religion. Personally, I don’t consider myself religious, and I appreciate a film that takes an honest look at belief systems without an agenda. Heretic dives into various religions with a surprising level of care and even-handedness. It’s presented in such a way that, even if you don’t have a background in religious study, you’ll be able to follow and appreciate what it’s trying to say. This added layer is interesting but only adds so much weight in the end. Don't ask me how accurate it is, because I have no idea. It seemed logical is all I can say.

Image by Collider

Final Thoughts

Score: 6 out of 10. Hugh Grant’s performance holds this movie together, and the script has some very interesting ideas, especially in its take on faith and manipulation. But after the initial intrigue, the characters don’t develop much, and the plot starts to feel one-dimensional, despite the attempted twists. It’s creepy enough to warrant a watch, but this might be one you wait for at home rather than the theater. A solid effort with some standout moments but falls short of being unforgettable.


Pros:

  • Uniquely unsettling: The captor’s upfront, conversational approach to terror is refreshingly creepy, relying on his words rather than typical horror tactics.
  • Hugh Grant’s standout performance: Grant's transformation here is incredible. He brings a chilling authenticity, grounding the entire film with his unsettling charisma.
  • Strong supporting performances: Chloe East and Sophie Thatcher nail their roles, making their characters feel believable and relatable amidst the horror.
  • Interesting religious themes: The film’s exploration of religious comparison is thought-provoking, especially for non-religious viewers, offering a surprisingly balanced perspective.

Cons:

  • Predictable story arc: Once you understand the plot, it’s not hard to guess where things are headed, limiting the suspense in the final act.
  • Minimal character development: Despite strong performances, the characters (except perhaps Chloe’s) don’t experience much depth or growth.
  • Ending lacks impact: Although there’s a twist, it’s subtle and doesn’t add significant weight to the story’s resolution.
  • May not justify a theater visit: The film's appeal might not be enough to warrant the big screen experience; it’s one that could work just as well for a home viewing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something

IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame

Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St