Skip to main content

The Boogeyman - Back to the Closet

 Ok, so it's been a while since my last review. I'll be honest, I've become very disenfranchised with the whole movie scene this year. It seems like one after another, each movie comes out and is just, well, garbage. So I started to think, why rate movies at all if the ratings never really change much? Then the hiatus. Diablo 4 came out in the meantime, and yes, I've spent a lot of time playing that too, but I've also watched A LOT of movies in the last few months. What has suddenly brought me back to share my views with you today you might ask? A friend's Facebook post of all things. "Just watched 'The Boogeyman'. This may be the scariest thing I've ever seen", and then I threw up in my mouth a little. So here we go. Yes, I've watched The Boogeyman.

Image by IMDB

Let's start by saying this is far from the worst movie I have seen, after all, I've watched the Requin and half of Drown the Clown (That review for another day *gross full body shivers from how terrible it was*). My real issues with the movie are the same issues with almost all movies recently, or easily in 2023: They never push the envelope. No one REALLY wants to scare anyone anymore. If they did, they'd shoot for an "R" rating not a "PG-13". As soon as you put your movie into that younger box, all hopes of a real scary movie leaves, and you're left with something resembling The Boogeyman. I know film makers want the added cash of the younger audience. Make it a good, rated "R" film and the adults that have the money will go see it again and again, rather than one and done. Look at IT Chapter 1 as a newer example. Also, creating these films for the youth takes away from that magical place that used to exist. Stay with me now. There was a time when movies were physically rented! I know right! And as a child, you would stray away from your parents for a couple of minutes to run over to the horror section, which you knew you weren't allowed to watch yet. You would gasp and be in awe at the cases of movies that featured all things horror, and even those small images made you want to watch them. The sheer fact that you weren't allowed to watch them yet made you want to watch them that much more. That excitement is what I'm talking about. A kid hears rated "R" and knows there's something there that has been made for eyes older than theirs and they can't wait to be scared by it. Now though.....those days are dead and gone. Not only the rental stores, but the excitement because they can watch it online whenever they want, from the comfort of being at home. That alone, diminishes the experience of a horror movie. I digress.

Image by Variety

The Boogeyman is your average script about a mediocre family dealing with the death of their mother/wife. There's nothing special to run home about this family. They're average, white, suburban, well-off economically and socially accepted. Aside from the loss of their mother/wife, there's nothing to remember about these characters. More throw away characters in a throw away movie with a throw away plot device. I'm sorry that I sound tired and cranky, but, well, I am. This basic premise is the setup for many, many movies now, and they're so close that it get's hard to tell them apart. Don't believe me? Look up Countdown, Come Play, It Follows, It Comes At Night, Grimcutty, The Babadook, the list can go on and on. Now, do some of these have a shining light? Absolutely. At least Come Play tried to make an original idea of having an Autistic child experiencing these events, however, the monster in question is the same; something in the darkness that should never be seen because as soon as you see it as the audience, the laughter begins. Especially Grimcutty. *Shutters in grossness again*

Image by Screen Realm

I digress a bit, but my main point still comes alive here. Hollywood doesn't really want to scare people anymore. It's all about the money now. Horror films used to be about leaving someone with a wet seat, now it's all dollar signs. Low budget, big box office. So, let's do some examples. If the Boogeyman wanted to really scare people, and I mean REALLY scare people, then make it "R" and have some fun with it. Don't just throw the child around, kill it. Break the unwritten rule, show a child death. Shock the audience. Too much? Fine, at least bring the body count up. A "Demon" thing in the darkness only happens to kill a couple of children in the whole movie? I doubt it.

Image by The Direct

The plot is weak and again, suffers like most movies now. The writers create this world in their heads and forget that the audience isn't in there. They forget to tell us things about the movie and we're supposed to fill in the blanks. So again, this movie states at one point that "I think it's always been here" alluding that this thing is eternal and has been around since the dawn of time. That's fine, good start. Now have someone do some actual research. Have them find mentions of this entity in the bible, cave paintings, other literature. Tell us something about this thing or I don't care. Honestly, I want a story, not just loud music that tells you exactly when something will happen (Anther terrible horror movie trope now).

Image by IMDB

Jaws is a great example that these new writers should watch and read the script for. It's a simple movie about a large shark. Doesn't really sound that scary. The fact that you don't see the shark for most of the movie is what makes it scary. The audiences imagination is always scarier than anything you can write, or show with CGI. Friday the 13th also adopted this, and for the most part was great for it. Blair Witch Project also does this format very well. Grimcutty would have been great if the movie had kept the monster in the shadows. Show pieces or glimpses here or there, but we don't need to see the whole thing. If you need to show us the whole monster, try to use practical effects. It always looks scarier when the thing is actually there. 

Image by Digital Spy

Another issue with these movies that has become a thing, is the writers can't seem to find ways to destroy these things without them being "real". Yes, I realize this is nothing new, but even movies like A Nightmare on Elm Street tell you WHY they have to make him real. In The Boogeyman we are sort of told the rules of the world in a very vague sort of way, and that the entity lives in the darkness, and hates the light. Ok well, first off, don't use a loop hole of "Well he only hates certain lights", that's just lazy writing. Secondly, if it lives in the shadows and is able to disappear at will within the darkness, how can it be whole? Like physical? Why would it be physical? Like, if the entity had to choose to bring its-self into our reality to eat children or something, then that's fine, but TELL US THAT! That's back to the research piece. As a viewer I'm just wondering why they don't blow up their house if they know the thing's in there. Wouldn't that be easier? No where for it to go apparently if it's physical form. I digress.

Image by PrivateMovieZ

Again, this isn't the worse thing I've seen. It's unfortunately far from it, but there's nothing special here. Another bland movie, with forgettable characters about another entity that does a couple of bad things, that lives forever, except when a teenage girl needs to kill it. I understand there's a writers strike over AI. I'm starting to think it's because the writers know the computer can likely write better than they can. Realistically, a computer doesn't care about morality, or the mother goose ending to things. I'm sure AI could turn out something much darker, creepier, violent, distressing and most of all, something unique.

Overall score: 5 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- There are some unique camera shots. 
- An ok take on a very old mechanic. 
- When it's dark, it's actually dark. Few blue lights here. 

Cons:
- Just like most horror movies of the 2010's an onward. 
- No substance. 
- Flat performances, little to no tension, forgettable characters. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something

IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame

Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St