Skip to main content

Great Adventure - Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves

Well it was bound to happen at some point. A good movie has finally hit theatres. Dungeons and Dragons had recently made headlines for greedy practices outside of the theatre, so I went into the movie with admittedly low expectations. Finally, I was wrong. Finally a movie in 2023 worth the price of admission for me.

Picture by Forbes

Also admittedly, I am a D&D player. I have been most of my life. So to say I'm biased is easy, but in a lot of cases, I expected that to work against my review of the movie before seeing it. The plot of the film is very over-the-top, but this works because many D&D adventurers are just like that. It really reminded me of a simpler time when you could just watch a movie and just enjoy it for what it was. The lore is obviously not the same as it was in the D&D lore books. By many accounts, there was no real way for a lot of the core material to be properly adapted to the screen. However, the things that were, were done very right in my opinion.

Photo by Vanity Fair

A great example of this is Helga, the Barbarian. During the first fight scene I had that woke culture thought of "Oh great, here's another example of a female fighter that will steal the show and step on the male counter-part to do it", and I was so wrong. Yes, Helga is powerful and she fights very well, and yes she does save Ed (Chris Pine) on several occasions, but in these cases, the events are done very organically. She's a Barbarian, she's supposed to fight and be rough. Once I figured out that they were actually using classes in the movie, I was so pleased. Then the movie introduces us to a young sorcerer and then the druid. Yes, the druid does not function like a druid does in D&D, but in my opinion, she was better. No only was she a Tiefling race, she wasn't constrained by old rules of engagement and was able to transform at will and into virtually whatever create she wanted. To see it live action was simply a treat. This movie was a clear example of the production teams and director actually understanding the source material and staying as true as they could to it.

Photo by Dicebreaker

Many of the smaller facets of D&D were also added, again, organically to the film. Things from needing to attune to a magical piece of equipment before it will work correctly (or at all), explaining that a spell has a cast range of 500ft, or even the easy things like adding in a Gelatinous Cube or the Mimic Chest. Simply Beautiful.

Photo by Geekwire

Was the movie perfect? Of course not. Did the druid need to do the "Hulk-smash" thing at the end, no. Was the plot predictable, yes. The characters all had arcs in the story, but few were really flushed out. There was lots of lore left on the table and many things spoken about and just left there. A great example of this is when they talk about (and enter) the Underdark. The paladin they are with at the time explains "its a dangerous place", but that's the only explanation the audience gets. I'm not saying we need a 10 minute dialogue dump of every environment they enter, but something like the Underdark that is very important to D&D likely should have more discussion. The acting was believable enough, but nothing over the top here with the exception of Hugh Grant. I thought he was a strange pick for a D&D movie, but he pulled off the character very well. When you hate a character in media, that means the actor has done their job well. 

Photo by Screen Rant

I felt like the movie had a few missed opportunities, and that it could have ended a little before it did, but overall, well made film. If it helps anyone out there, I liked it enough that I saw it in theatres twice.


Overall score: 8 out of 10 stars


Pros:
- Respects the source material and wasn't just a money grab.
- Special effects were top-notch.
- A great adventure the whole family can watch. 

Cons:
- Does not push any limits of story telling, special effects, acting, etc. 
- Very predictable plot points.
- Limited character arcs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...

Girl in the Basement: A Disturbing Story That’s Hard to Shake Off

Girl in the Basement is a film that might easily be overlooked as just another made-for-TV movie, but that would be a mistake. It’s actually a surprisingly well-crafted and emotionally gripping film, especially considering its television origins. Image by Senscritique A Heartbreaking, True Story The story at the heart of Girl in the Basement is absolutely heartbreaking. We’ve all seen movies that claim to be "Based on real events," but this one is different. It doesn’t take liberties with the truth for the sake of drama. In fact, it tones down the horrific reality of the true story it’s based on, which is almost unheard of. After researching the actual events, it’s clear why the filmmakers made this choice—it would have been too much to bear otherwise.  Image by Heavy.com Genuine Suspense and Engagement It’s been a long time since a film had me so actively engaged in the moment. The suspense in Girl in the Basement is palpable. From the first moment, I found myself anxious...

The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...