Skip to main content

No Honey For Pooh (Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey review)

 Ok let's get this one over with. Now, to say I was intrigued when I heard that no only had Winnie The Pooh's copyright changed to Public, but that someone was already making a horror movie based on the events at the 100 Achre Woods, would have been an understatement. I knew not to expect much from this, but the premise was golden: a childhood story retold definitely not how you remember it. I was hoping to see a dark fairy tale like the original Three Little Pigs story or the original Hansel and Grettle story (PS if you haven't read those original stories, they're pretty horific to say the least). What we got...well....the budget for this movie was 100k. That's what you got. Don't forget, Downy Jr. Made millions alone just to be in Infinity War, so 100k budget for everything in the film....sounds like a dumster fire. Oh yes, the flames were high on this one.

Photo by Jagged Edge Entertainment

So, although I liked the idea for the movie, it was completely predictable, droll and almost comical (not on purpose). To make these creatures like Pooh and Piglet "real", the film adapts them into ferral, human-best creatures, which on it's own sounds ok, but it really losses it's luster fast. Especially when there is just no doubting at all that these "creatures" are people with masks on. They didn't even try to hide it, or use CGI to make them more real. Nothing. I actually felt kinda' like I was watching a worse version of Friday the 13th Part 2, where Jason has the bag on his head. It's jarring, unnatural and unintentionally hilarioius. There were certainly parts where I literally said out loud "look! She's going to have her top ripped off to show the audience some nudity, then she will die!" and sure enough, it happened. I swear I almost felt Jason Voorhees' head poke around the corner of a tree once in a while like "Hey! That's my motto!".

Photo by Fathom Events/ITN Studios

The action and acting is easily sub-par even for an indie film. There's little I can say about the movie in a good light actually. Oh I got one! The animated story at the beginning was well crafted, writen and drawn! Yeah I did it! I found the one good thing!

In all seriousness, the movie gives you a taste of what you think might be to come, introducing hard topics like metal illness, abandonment, resentment, Stockholm Syndrome, PTSD etc but unfortunately throws all of that in the bin almost immidiately to go for the average slasher film vibe. This may have worked for someone out there, but Winnie-the-Pooh was never going to stand toe-to-toe with the likes of Ghostface, Jason, Freddy or Myers. The film would have been better if it had just decided to stick with the hard themes and use it's own voice to tell the story, rather than trying to shoe-horn it's-self into a specific genre of horror. 

Photo by Jagged Edge Entertainment

I think rewritten as a psychological horror or thriller could actually have worked, but as is, I regret losing the hour and a half I had to watch it. Save yourself the trouble. I watched it so you don't have to.


Overall score: 3 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- Childhood story made as a horror movie!
- Opening animation was well scripted and animated.

Cons:
- The killers' special effects and/or masks, wardrobe etc was absolutely terrible.
- Not enough suspense, thrills and/or horror. 
- No character arcing for anyone, at all. Not even an attempt. "Here's generic person about to die" kind of writing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fantastic Four: First Steps – A Cautious Beginning That Barely Walks

Going into Fantastic Four: First Steps , I’ll be honest—I was hesitantly optimistic. Marvel's recent track record hasn’t exactly been confidence-inspiring, and I didn’t know whether this film would add to the pile of forgettables or manage to pull something worthwhile from the rubble. The short version? It’s better than what came before it... but that’s a low bar to clear. Image by Disney Better... But That’s Not Saying Much Yes, this is the best Fantastic Four film so far—but let’s not throw a parade just yet. That’s like saying a sprained ankle is better than a broken leg. It’s still not a good time. This isn’t Infinity War or No Way Home . It’s more like a cautiously made, safe middle-ground that never dares to do anything bold or game-changing. Image by Consequence.net Retro Aesthetic Done Right On the positive side, I liked the unexpected characters that popped in here and there, and I thought the alternative 60s timeline worked surprisingly well. The aesthetic was actually ...
Post a Comment
Read more