Skip to main content

Freaky - Not So Much

Let's start this off by saying that the comedy/horror genre of movies isn't my favourite. I love horror and I love comedy. I just don't feel like the two should date. So please, if you like the genre, take this review with a grain of salt.

The movie started off really strong in the horror sense. The music was there. The creepy vibe was there. The creepy "Campfire" story for the killer was present. We had a good start to a slasher flick that I would have probably really liked. But, the nosedive happened about ten minutes into the film.

This movie's main problem, in my opinion, was it stayed very flat the whole time. It wasn't really scary during the horror parts, and it wasn't really funny during the comedic parts. It was just, well, blah. There were parts that make you snicker of course, and there were certainly suspenseful or creepy parts. But you can't expect a second here and a second there of these moments to end up making a masterpiece.

Unfortunately, the movie missed the mark as a horror and as a comedy. This really surprised me actually because Vince Vaughn is well known for his comedic escapades, however, in this film, I thought he did his best acting when he was the killer. He was ruthless at times, creepy, engaged, focused. Everything a good serial killer needs to be. But we don't get to see him like that very much throughout the movie. In Jumanji, Jack Black was hilarious as a female; Vince, not so much. He certainly tried, but there were many scenes that he just seemed to be over-acting, or trying way too hard. It's unfortunate because the premise of the movie was fantastic. The setting, and even the story, for the most part, were very well planned out. I really think more emphasis should have been put on making the movie hilarious. I could have looked past the horror not being scary if it was really funny, but it just wasn't. 

The classic horror tropes were all present: The chainsaw, the comedically large kitchen knife even a mask is prevalently used. The directors clearly liked horror movies because there were little Easter-eggs spread out all over the movie; From a manikin's head full of nails imaging Pinhead from the Hellraiser series to the blatant use of a chainsaw during some of the (few as they may have been) murder scenes. The movie struggled with sense and pacing. There were many instances that the characters make, we'll call them questionable choices. Choices that no level headed, regular person would generally make. The dramatic scenes were too long in between the very short action sequences. The movie really seemed almost hollow in trying to establish if it should be funny or scary.

I've certainly watched worse movies, but that doesn't make this a good one either. I don't say this often, but if you can wait for this to go digital to watch in your house, then do so. Don't waste the $12 and the chance of COVID to see this in the theatre.

Overall score: 3 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- Story was written with the classic slasher tropes in mind.
- Vince Vaughn as a serial killer is very well done.


Cons:
- Neither very funny nor very scary.
- Vaughn as a female is forced at best.
- Had pacing issues as well as scripting issues.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Monkey (2025): Don't March to This Drum

I had no idea what I was getting into with The Monkey. I went in more or less blind, but given that it was based on a Stephen King story, I had some hope. With the success of It and even the more mediocre Pet Sematary remake, I figured this could be another solid King adaptation. Man, was I ever misguided. Image by IMDb Aesthetic Confusion: What Year Is It? Right away, something felt off. The film starts in 1999—or at least that’s what it claims—but absolutely nothing in the children’s room or the general set design reflects that era. No Blockbuster VHS tapes, no Nirvana posters, no era-appropriate TV shows, not even the right music. Instead, it all feels straight out of the 80s. Then we meet the boys’ Aunt and Uncle, and we’re suddenly in That 70’s Show . The uncle even has the classic 70’s sideburns. The entire aesthetic is a bizarre mishmash of decades, making it feel like the filmmakers didn’t actually care about immersing the audience in the supposed time period. Image by Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fantastic Four: First Steps – A Cautious Beginning That Barely Walks

Going into Fantastic Four: First Steps , I’ll be honest—I was hesitantly optimistic. Marvel's recent track record hasn’t exactly been confidence-inspiring, and I didn’t know whether this film would add to the pile of forgettables or manage to pull something worthwhile from the rubble. The short version? It’s better than what came before it... but that’s a low bar to clear. Image by Disney Better... But That’s Not Saying Much Yes, this is the best Fantastic Four film so far—but let’s not throw a parade just yet. That’s like saying a sprained ankle is better than a broken leg. It’s still not a good time. This isn’t Infinity War or No Way Home . It’s more like a cautiously made, safe middle-ground that never dares to do anything bold or game-changing. Image by Consequence.net Retro Aesthetic Done Right On the positive side, I liked the unexpected characters that popped in here and there, and I thought the alternative 60s timeline worked surprisingly well. The aesthetic was actually ...
Post a Comment
Read more