Skip to main content

Beautiful Boy - Gorgeous or just Pretty

I have stated before that drama is simply not my favourite genre of movie. However, I do find myself watching more and more of these movies as I grow ever older in life. Beautiful Boy is a movie about drug addiction and how it affects a family, specifically in this case a father and son. Though I won't be rating this film as high as many other film-critics have, it was a good movie overall.

Being a father myself, I was easily drawn into Steve Carell's (the father's) shoes as to how I might react if one of my children were quite literally throwing away their life. The family moments were very touching and I loved Steve's performance. I was curious to see how he would do in a serious film as I've really only seen him in comedies. He absolutely nailed the role.

The film has some issues for me though. My first real problem was the way Timothée Chalamet's character Nick (the son) seemed to only have his addictions while he lived with his father. He moves in with his mother at a point in the movie, and with little effort shown on screen, becomes drug-free for 14 months! There were a lot of parts in this movie that felt rushed through, or like a piece of the scene was left on the editing floor. The movie really struggled to tell me why Nick turned to drugs in the first place, and why he continued to use them. I'm sure there was a reason, but the movie never really comes out and tells or shows you.

One other small criticism I had was the timeline. The beginning of the movie jumps all over the place with Nick's age; 1 shot he'll be 8, then the next shot he's 16, then we're up-to-date the next, then he's 11. Simple all over. I think simple subtitles like "5 years ago" would have fixed it for me at least because the scenes themselves were very well shot and acted. It was very hard to follow during the first quarter of the movie.

For how sensitive of a subject drug addiction is, I felt that the movie, for the most part, was fair in how the drug users were portrayed. These weren't dark shady characters always hanging out on a street corner; they seemed like real people, with I'm sure, real issues. Although the hallmark moments were very effective, I continually felt like the movie was missing something. I still can't put my finger on it. I seemed to begin to tear up during a scene, and then it would end. As absurd as it sounds, I never got the full cry, which left me wondering what I missed, or did I miss something.

Overall, it was worth seeing the movie, but I'd be lying if I said that I was totally satisfied with what I watched.

Overall score: 6 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- Family crisis moments seemed real
- Steve Carell was fantastic
- The family dynamics were very well done

Cons:
- The time jumps without letting the viewer know where you are
- Some scenes seemed cut off
- Some inconsistency with Nick's character

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something

IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame

Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St