Skip to main content

Halloween - A Return to Haddonfield

Halloween. Easily one of my favourite horror franchises. I've been a fan through all the twists and turns Michael Myers' backstory has taken throughout the decades. I love the Shape. I always have. I remember the first time I saw the original Halloween. The terror I felt, the almost awe I was in due to the soundtrack. The Shape truly scared me, especially when he broke through the closet door, proving that he'll do anything to get his victim.

This new edition to the series is set 40 years after the first movie, basically saying the others don't exist. And, I'm ok with that. None of the movies after the first captured the magic of the original. They all have their strengths, but they also all have more weaknesses. From explaining Michael's family lineage to the cult of the Thorn, all the way to those dastardly remakes, I stayed true and kept watching. With the 2018 release basically retconning all the sequels and Blum House Productions being involved, I had high hopes for this one.

Let's get started. The Shape is definitely back. He moved like Michael does, acts and reacts the same. This time the Shape was back in true form. His menacing walk made me almost fall back into the original movie. Even the way he occasionally turned his head slightly to admire his "work" was very close to the original. Myers this time around was that close to the original in almost every way possible. Having said that, that's about where the old feelings from the original end. Yes, there are similar shots, parallels in framing and of course, the score is still the same as the original, well, close at least. The acting from all the characters new and old is bang on with what you would expect from these people if these events were truly happening. I applaud the cast for really nailing the emotional tolls that would be felt from the original events.

There are unfortunately very glaring, in your face problems with the movie. In many, many places. So many inconsistencies within its own movie let alone apparently taking place 40 years after the original. Michael is super strong, as he is in all the movies, but he can't seem to move a cabinet? He somehow becomes an electrician for one of his kills, but can't figure out a one-button remote? The kills are good... Well, at least the ones that you see are. There were a lot of kills that you know happen, but don't see. I'm going to sound like a serial killer, but when I go to a slasher flick, I expect to see a bunch of people get hacked to pieces. It's just a given, and when it doesn't happen, it kinda' lets you down.

I was a little surprised to learn that the film had an "R" rating because there really isn't anything super gory in the movie. Yeah, a younger kid swears but I didn't think that was enough for an "R". I felt a bit let down in general from the lack of action and lack of kills. It seemed at many times like the movie was actually attempting to get a "PG-13" rating, was too violent for that, but then left it instead of going all out for the "R".

I'm actually not saying it's a bad movie; far from it actually. It's easily one of the best Halloween movies in the series. Straight to the point was a nice approach. Although, the point eluded me at times. In the first two films, they elaborate to say that Laurie Strode is Michael's sister, and he kills his family. This one (as seen in the trailers) says that was just a story. But, if it was just a story, what's the link between Michael and Laurie? The one that got away? They don't really explain it in the movie. They kinda' try to a little bit, but it's very vague and never entirely makes sense.

Between the Shape being nearly perfect in performance, but killings being done off screen and a weird, un-needed twist, I can't rate the movie as highly as I'd like to. It's actually fairly difficult to rate in a standard 10-star system. Again, the acting was great, and the Shape was phenomenal, but the story was very weak and there were a lot of terrible issues throughout the movie. It's like for every good thing, there's an equal poor thing.

Overall score: 6.5 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- The Shape was almost perfect
- Kills that we're seen were great
- The soundtrack is equally as good as the original
- Overall acting was very well done, especially for a horror movie

Cons:
- Some kills that could have been great, were done off screen
- Slow moving at many parts
- Glaring inconsistencies
- Predictable ending (that also doesn't really make a lot of sense)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something

IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame

Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St