Skip to main content

Rampage: Friend or Foe

Being the old man that I am, I grew up playing Rampage in arcades, Commodore 64 and NES. Later on, there was also a few other adaptations like the more popular one from the Nintendo 64. This movie I was kinda' afraid for as not only is it a video game adaption movie, but it's based on a game that doesn't really have a story behind it.

For those of you that are not familiar with the game, three creatures, George the ape, Ralph the wolf and Lizzy the lizard, grow to gigantic proportions and destroy city after city. That was basically the premise being Rampage until the Nintendo 64 version where they introduced the creature's backstories and the main villain. The movie seemed based loosely (very) on this version of the game, understandably.

I went into the movie expecting a simple blow 'em up, destroy the monster kind of movie, but was pleasantly surprised by what I saw. More and more I found myself thinking about the characters involved, feeling for the animals and being sucked into the cinescape. The movie, by the end, was a combination of a monster movie and a disaster movie.
The Rock is perfect for this type of movie. His performance is reminiscent of Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sylvester Stallone in their action movies of the 80's and '90s. If you are a serious person, don't see this movie. It's a silly idea of course. If you watch with an open mind, and love old-school type action flicks, this is definitely for you.

There is a ton of fitting comedy mixed with great action and even a little suspense at times. Those with young children, I took my three to see it and they all loved the movie. Be warned, there's a tiny bit of swearing and a few more grown-up moments for sure, but nothing that kids probably haven't seen or heard on YouTube.

Overall, the action was great, the story was ok and the chemistry between the leads was weak, but I'd still tell people to watch the movie. If you want a really fun, nest alias feeling type of action flick to eat popcorn to and forget about the days' problems, this is it.
On a side note, I really have to say that the movie did a great job of giving the creatures personalities of their own, especially George the ape. There were two separate moments where I even teared up in regards to what was happening to George. To make me care about a character that isn't even human, well done. Although the chemistry between The Rock and his counterpart was extremely flimsy at best, The Rock's apparent connection to George the Ape was amazingly well done. Easily believable that the two of them have spent years building trust. Hats off to that.

Overall score: 7 out of 10 stars

Pros:
- Monster and disaster movie in one!
- Great "real-world" premise
- Awesome effects
- Great action sequences
Cons:
- Poor (human) main character chemistry
- Weak story
- Predictable ending
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Bagman (2024): A Surprising Slow Burn That Defies Expectations

Going into The Bagman , I was fully prepared to sit through a low-budget gorefest, packed with cheap jump scares and predictable plotlines. But to my surprise, what I got was something much more refined—a slow-burn suspense thriller that outshines many bigger-budget projects. The film uses its time wisely, building tension and setting up a compelling atmosphere, while steering clear of the typical pitfalls that drag many horror flicks down. Image by IMDb Slow and Steady Wins the Race This movie doesn’t rush. It takes its time to develop the story, but does so in a way that keeps you mildly hooked. It’s one of those rare films where the slower pacing actually benefits the narrative, allowing each element to breathe and come into focus. You won’t find rapid-fire scares here, but rather a creeping sense of unease that makes you wonder what’s lurking in the shadows. The way The Bagman sets up its "rules"—through a twisted fairy tale—was pure brilliance. By tapping into something
Post a Comment
Read more

IF: A Great Concept Drowned in Missed Opportunities

Alright, let’s dive into IF , the latest flick that had all the potential to be a heartwarming tale but ended up stumbling over its own premise. Before we get too far in, I must say, I had hopes. Not high hopes, but hopes. With a unique concept and a cast that included Ryan Reynolds, you’d think this film would be a surefire hit. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. IF introduces us to the world of imaginary friends (IFs) and the impact they have on the people who create them. Sounds intriguing, right? Sadly, what starts as a promising setup quickly turns into a muddled mess. The concept is great, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. Image by FirstShowing.net The Good Let’s start on a positive note: Cailey Fleming , who plays Bea, did a remarkable job with what she was given. Her portrayal of a girl caught between childhood and adulthood was nuanced and believable. She brought a sense of maturity to her role while still managing to capture the innocence of being a kid. It's a shame
Post a Comment
Read more

Inside Out 2: Out of My Mind for Watching or Worth the Emotions?

Alright folks, I recently had the pleasure of seeing “Inside Out 2”. Let’s get this out of the way: I was super pumped for this sequel, but hesitantly optimistic given Disney’s recent track record. How did it fare out? Let’s dive in. Almost There, But Not Quite Mind-Blowing “Inside Out 2” brings back our beloved emotional crew – Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear – along with some new faces that shake up Riley’s teenage mind. The gang’s all here, and their banter is just as entertaining as ever. But while the first “Inside Out” was a masterclass in making us feel all the feels, this one doesn’t quite hit the same high notes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a good time. Imagine going to your favorite ice cream shop, ordering the double fudge sundae, but they give you the single scoop instead. It’s still delicious, but you’re left thinking, “This could have been epic.” That’s “Inside Out 2” in a nutshell – satisfying, but you know it had the potential to be something more. Image by St
Post a Comment
Read more